Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 16 results ...
Carpenter, N and Bausman, D C (2016) Project Delivery Method Performance for Public School Construction: Design-Bid-Build versus CM at Risk. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Chang, C and Chen, S (2016) Transitional Public–Private Partnership Model in China: Contracting with Little Recourse to Contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Chen, C, Wang, Q, Martek, I and Li, H (2016) International Market Selection Model for Large Chinese Contractors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Choi, J O, O’Connor, J T and Kim, T W (2016) Recipes for Cost and Schedule Successes in Industrial Modular Projects: Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Choi, K and Lee, H W (2016) Deconstructing the Construction Industry: A Spatiotemporal Clustering Approach to Profitability Modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
de Castro e Silva Neto, D, Cruz, C O, Rodrigues, F and Silva, P (2016) Bibliometric Analysis of PPP and PFI Literature: Overview of 25 Years of Research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Duzkale, A K and Lucko, G (2016) Exposing Uncertainty in Bid Preparation of Steel Construction Cost Estimating: I. Conceptual Framework and Qualitative C-I-V-I-L Classification. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Duzkale, A K and Lucko, G (2016) Exposing Uncertainty in Bid Preparation of Steel Construction Cost Estimating: II. Comparative Analysis and Quantitative C-I-V-I-L Classification. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Gwak, H, Son, S, Park, Y and Lee, D (2016) Exact Time–Cost Tradeoff Analysis in Concurrency-Based Scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Harper, C M, Molenaar, K R and Cannon, J P (2016) Measuring Constructs of Relational Contracting in Construction Projects: The Owner’s Perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Moret, Y and Einstein, H H (2016) Construction Cost and Duration Uncertainty Model: Application to High-Speed Rail Line Project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Namian, M, Albert, A, Zuluaga, C M and Jaselskis, E J (2016) Improving Hazard-Recognition Performance and Safety Training Outcomes: Integrating Strategies for Training Transfer. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Construction safety; Safety training; Hazard identification; Hazard recognition; Training transfer; Training delivery; Safety management; Labor and personnel issues;
- ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001160
- Abstract:
Most construction safety activities focus on managing identified hazards. Hazards that remain unrecognized, and as a result unmanaged, can potentially result in catastrophic and unexpected injuries. Therefore, proper hazard recognition is foundational to the success of any safety program. However, recent research has revealed that a large proportion of construction hazards remain unrecognized in construction projects. To improve hazard recognition performance, employers provide their workers with safety and hazard recognition training. Despite these efforts, desirable levels of hazard recognition have not been achieved, and the anticipated return on investment (ROI) from training has not been attained. Such failures in training efforts are partly because knowledge acquired through training programs is often not transferred or applied in the workplace. Subsequently, training efforts do not alter work practices or behavior once workers return to the field. Other reasons for training failure include improper training delivery and the adoption of low-engagement training methods. To advance theory and practice in hazard recognition, training transfer, and training delivery, the objectives of this study were to (1) identify training transfer elements that maximize the transfer of safety training, (2) evaluate the relative effectiveness of the identified training transfer elements in transferring safety knowledge gained through training programs, and (3) assess the interaction effect between training method (i.e., high-engagement versus low-engagement training) and training transfer levels on hazard recognition performance. The objectives of the study were accomplished by gathering input from construction industry experts through interviews, questionnaire surveys, and the analysis of empirical data gathered from 51 case projects in the United States. The results of the study revealed that training efforts may be undermined if training transfer elements are not synergistically adopted. Specifically, the findings suggest that safety training is necessary, but is not sufficient to maximize training outcomes such as hazard recognition. To maximize safety training outcomes, employers must adopt training transfer elements along with high-engagement training methods. This study represents the first formal attempt to evaluate the role of training transfer elements in the construction context.
Poshdar, M, González, V A, Raftery, G M, Orozco, F, Romeo, J S and Forcael, E (2016) A Probabilistic-Based Method to Determine Optimum Size of Project Buffer in Construction Schedules. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Ramaji, I J and Memari, A M (2016) Product Architecture Model for Multistory Modular Buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Salas, R and Hallowell, M (2016) Predictive Validity of Safety Leading Indicators: Empirical Assessment in the Oil and Gas Sector. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).
Sveikauskas, L, Rowe, S, Mildenberger, J, Price, J and Young, A (2016) Productivity Growth in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10).